This episode marks one year of Frequency!

Jenni Field and Chuck Gose dig into four stories that together reveal a system under pressure: from the psychology of corporate jargon to an emerging reader backlash against AI-generated content, the CFOs quietly reshaping workforce decisions, and the persistent myth that more hours means more output.

A Cornell psychologist has built a "corporate BS receptivity scale" tested on more than 1,000 workers, and the results are uncomfortable. People who rate jargon-heavy language as business savvy score significantly worse on analytical thinking, cognitive reflection, and workplace decision-making — while also reporting higher job satisfaction.

A new term is spreading online: AIDR, short for "AI didn't read," used by readers to dismiss content that smells like it came from a chatbot rather than a person. Developer David Minajirode coined it on. Jenni and Chuck argue that the real issue isn't AI assistance, it's authenticity — if you couldn't be bothered to write it, why should anyone be bothered to read it?

A survey of around 750 CFOs by Duke University economist John Graham, alongside economists from the Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta and Richmond, found that while AI had essentially no employment effect in 2025, CFOs now expect a 0.4% reduction in overall headcount this year — concentrated almost entirely in clerical, administrative, and customer service roles.

The final story uses new World Bank and UC Berkeley research — showing the world's employed adults work an average of 42 hours a week — to open up a much bigger question: what does the number of hours actually signal? Stanford research on British munitions workers from World War I found output declined beyond 48 hours and added nothing beyond 63. Yet Sergey Brin has reportedly called 60 hours the sweet spot, and Narayana Murthy of Infosys has advocated for 70-plus-hour weeks.

Want to find out more about Chuck’s work and ICology - check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/

Jenni’s a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication, you can find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/

Articles mentioned in this episode: 📍 People who love corporate BS are bad at their jobs, new Cornell research confirms 🔗 https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/people-who-love-corporate-bs-are-bad-at-their-jobs-new-cornell-research-confirms/91314405 📍 'AI; didn't read': AI;DR is the new TL;DR 🔗 https://www.fastcompany.com/91498062/ai-didnt-read-aidr-is-the-new-tldr

📍 America's chief financial officers say AI is coming for admin jobs 🔗 https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-admin-job-market-6a1c3436

📍 How many hours should employees work? A question that reveals something about every boss 🔗 https://www.economist.com/business/2025/12/04/how-many-hours-should-employees-work

From the science behind psychological safety to a product development model being applied to the trust crisis, via the ongoing debate about whether meetings count as real work, this is an episode full of practical frameworks and direct perspectives.

Jenni opens the conversation by exploring the Eat Sleep Work Repeat podcast, hosted by Bruce Daisley, which features Professor Katrien Franzen and her research on leadership and social identity. The central insight is the concept of "we-ness" — the idea that without a genuine sense of team belonging, psychological safety simply cannot take hold. Professor Franzen's research identifies four distinct leadership roles: task leader, motivational leader, social leader, and external leader. Jenni and Chuck examine whether it is realistic to expect formal leaders to embody all four.

The conversation turns to a Fortune article reporting that business leaders are raising the alarm over meeting culture, with Southwest Airlines CEO Bob Jordan among the latest to speak out. Nearly 80% of workers say they are drowning in meetings, and an Atlassian study of 5,000 workers across four continents found that 72% of meetings are deemed ineffective.

Shell Holtz's recent LinkedIn article introduces a framework that applies the Kano model — developed by Professor Noriaki Kano in the 1980s for product management — to the challenge of rebuilding employee trust. The context makes the framework all the more urgent: Gallup data shows only 21% of US employees strongly agree they trust their organisation's leadership, and the Edelman Trust Barometer has recorded its first global decline in employee trust in the study's 26-year history.

Jenni closes the episode with a look at the UK's Best Workplaces 2026 list. The numbers behind the list make the case compellingly: UK best workplaces perform more than four times better than the market and generate 6.25 times greater revenue per employee. Chuck raises a fair challenge about the nature of paid-for lists and the many great workplaces that simply are not on them, while Jenni argues that for internal comms and HR professionals the more productive question is: what are these organisations doing to build the trust that sits behind these results, and what can we learn from them?

Articles mentioned in this episode:

• Nike CEO vents to employees
• Eat Sleep Work Repeat: We-ness: The secret cause of Psychological Safety
• Meetings are not work
• The trust recession
• Best places to work in the UK 2026

Want to find out more about Chuck’s work and ICology - check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/

Jenni’s a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication, you can find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/

In Episode 50, Jenni Field and Chuck Gose are back together — Jenni returning from a trip to Japan and Chuck recording live from Las Vegas during Transform — to dig into four stories shaping the future of work, careers, and our relationship with AI.

The first story explores what's being called "career dysmorphia," with nearly six in ten millennial workers privately hoping for a layoff rather than choosing to leave on their own. A survey of 2,000 Gen Z and millennial workers found 37% dissatisfied with their roles and 55% unsettled in their careers. Jenni pushes back on the idea that this is purely a workplace problem, arguing it's really about personal agency. Chuck adds that with AI eliminating entry-level roles and 76% of HR professionals surveyed expecting significant hiring reductions, Gen Z may arrive to find there's no ladder at all.

The second story looks at women in their 40s and 50s leaving corporate roles in growing numbers — not because of burnout, but because, as McKinsey researcher Lareina Yee frames it, it's the absence of reciprocity. Chuck notes that the true cost of these departures — estimated at up to 213% of salary — still fails to capture the ripple effect on the teams left behind. Jenni connects RTO mandates as the tipping point, the straw that breaks the camel's back after years of consistently poor leadership behaviours stacking up.

The third story centres on Anthropic's study of nearly 81,000 Claude users across 159 countries and 70 languages — described as the largest and most multilingual qualitative study ever conducted on AI. Jenni and Chuck explore the striking geographic divide, with workers in lower- and middle-income countries far more optimistic about AI than those in Western Europe and North America, and question whether the dominant Western mindset of efficiency and productivity is a form of greed compared to the learning and opportunity lens seen elsewhere.

The fourth story introduces "AI brain fry" — a term coined by a Harvard Business Review study from BCG researcher Gabriella Rosen Kellerman — describing a specific form of cognitive overload from maintaining constant oversight of AI output, already affecting 14% of US workers. Jenni draws a sharp parallel to the long-established research on multitasking, questioning whether this is truly a new phenomenon or simply the same cognitive limits colliding with a tool of unprecedented scale. Chuck's advice to comms teams: be open, share your workflows, and talk to your manager — because the teams doing that are measurably reducing fatigue and doing better.

Articles mentioned in this episode:

• Millennials Don't Want to Quit. They Want to Get Laid Off.
• You're Not Burnt Out. You're Done.
• What 81,000 People Want from AI
• AI Brain Fry

Want to find out more about Chuck's work and ICology — check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/

Jenni's a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication. Find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/